The Difference of a Decade: Rising Purchases amid swings in market share

Made public by

sourced by PitchSend

1 of 13

Creator

CoreLogic logo
CoreLogic

Category

Real Estate

Published

2021

Slides

Transcriptions

#1CoreLogic 2011-2020 Investor Homebuying Report The Difference of a Decade: Rising Purchases amid swings in market share Contributors CoreLogic Office of the Chief Economist ©2021 CoreLogic, Inc. All Rights Reserved CLFIND20210475 2#2Table of Contents 03 Introduction 04 Investor Share Continued to Fall in 2020 06 Investor Activity Highest in California and Texas, Lowest in the Northeast 08 The Start of the Decade Looked Very Different from the End Increase in Investor Activity Associated with Greater 10 Housing Stock Turnover 12 The Path Forward CoreLogic#3Introduction In 2011, the United States had just reemerged from the 2006 housing market crash. Foreclosed homes were appearing on the market in spades, and many investors looking to snap up properties at a discount were buying. What began as a spree of purchases to capitalize on low-cost, high- growth properties in 2011 peaked in 2018. But since then, the pace of investment has slowed. By 2020, this decrease in investor purchase activity was disproportionately exhibited in bigger buyers, with small mom and pop investors making up a more significant share of investors than at any point in the past. Much has changed in the last decade. In this CoreLogic report, we use a new investment indicator to look at investor buying activity from several different perspectives. We also investigate activity nationally by both price tier and investor size and look at which regions have had the most and least activity. 3#4Investor Share Continued to Fall in 2020 In 2020, the investment rate (the unit volume share of all home purchases made by investors) in the U.S. housing market was 15.5%. This was a slowdown from 16.3% in 2019. Investor activity peaked in 2018 at just below 16.4%; however, the rate in 2016 was 15.3%. Thus, the current 15.5% rate is not unusually low. In particular, the 2020 investment rate is comparable to the 2012 rate of 15.7%, when low prices and the foreclosure crisis, following the 2006 housing market crash, made the market attractive to investors. Overall, investors have maintained a strong presence in the market over the decade, mostly oscillating within a narrow corridor of 15% to 17% of total purchases for the decade. While the investor share of purchases has swung higher and lower over the decade, the number of investor purchases has gradually risen. Since 2017, investors purchased about 1.1 million homes each year, but the share this made up of total home purchases varied. Investor Share of Purchases 16.4% 16.2% 16.0% 15.8% 15.6% 15.4% 15.2% 15.0% 14.8% CoreLogic 14.6% 2012 U.S Investor Homebuying Rates: 2011-2020 2014 Investor Share of Purchases 1100 1050 1000 950 900 850 800 750 700 2016 2018 2020 Investor Purchases Investor Purchases (Thousands)#5Smaller investors are responsible for the bulk of investor homebuying activity, and the rate appears to be increasing. Between 2011 and 2020, these so-called mom and pop investors who have kept 3-to-10 homes increased their share of homebuying more than large- and medium-sized investors, growing from 54% to 56%. This is due to a recent pickup, between 2018 and 2020 this share grew from 53% to 56%. Large investors, those who retained more than 100 homes, remain steady at around 12% since 2018. It seems small investors mostly took their market share from medium-sized investors those who kept between 11 and 100 homes - whose share fell from 34% to 32% of the market between 2018 and 2020. ― - 50% 40% 30% 20% 20% 19% 18% 17% 16% 15% 149 13% 12% 2012 U.S Investor Homebuying Rates by Price Tiers: 2011-2020 2014 2016 High Priced Homes Mid Priced Homes Low Priced Homes 2018 2020 U.S Investor Homebuying Rates by Investor Size: 2011-2020 10%- 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 Large Sized Investor Mid Sized Investor Small Sized investor Investor purchase rates were much higher among relatively low-priced homes. In 2020, 18.8% of purchases in the bottom one-third of prices for their respective metropolitan area were made by investors. That rate was well above those for the middle- and top-third of homes, with rates around 12%. Investor activity fell by 1- to-2 percentage points in all three tiers since 2018, consistent with the national trend. 5#6Investor Activity Highest in California and Texas, Lowest in the Northeast Investor homebuying rates varied significantly across the country over the past decade. Rates were highest in California and Texas. These states had six of the top 10 metropolitan areas with the highest investor rates for the decade with Corpus Christi, Texas, and Los Angeles leading the way. Outside of Texas and California, Las Vegas was another Western city with high investor rates. Wichita, Kansas; Memphis, Tennessee and Boise, Idaho were the other three metros in the top 10. CoreLogic batorial may U.S Investor Homebuying Rates: Top Ten MSAS, 2011-2020 25% 20% 15% 1096 5% 096- San Diego-Carlsbad, CA San jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA Boise City, ID Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA Memphis, TN-MS-AR Wichita, KS McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX Corpus Christi, TX Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA 6#7Investor activity during the decade was lowest in the Northeast, with eight of the bottom 10 metro areas representing the region. Hartford, Connecticut had the lowest investor activity with a rate of just under 8%. Madison, Wisconsin, was the sole Midwestern market on the list with a rate of about 10%. Spokane, Washington, was the only West Coast market with a rate of 10%. Investors are most likely deterred by the stagnant population growth in places like Pittsburgh and Hartford, Connecticut as well as stringent regulations in places like Providence, Rhode Island.¹ 1096 898 696 496 1 According to the 2018 Wharton Residential Land Use and Regulation Index, Providence has the third strictest land use regulations of metro areas in the US. See Gyourko, J., Hartley, J., & Krimmel, J., The Local Residential Land Use Regulatory Environment Across U.S. Housing Markets: Evidence from a New Wharton Index, NBER Working Paper #26573 296 096- CoreLogic U.S Investor Homebuying Rates: Bottom Ten MSAs, 2011-2020 Rochester, NY Providence-Warwick, RI-MA Pittsburgh, PA Worcester, MA-CT New Haven-Milford, CT Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT Madison, WI Spokane-Spokane Valley, WA 7#8The Start of the Decade Looked Very Different from the End California dominated investor activity at the start of the decade. In 2011, Los Angeles, San Jose, San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Oxnard, Stockton and Riverside were all in the top 10 metro areas with the highest investor activity. This reflects the nature of the market in the wake of the Great Recession. California was hit hard and consequently had many foreclosures and sales of real-estate owned by financial institutions. Conversely, not a single California metro area made the top 10 in 2020, after having been supplanted by cities in the Mountain West, the western Midwest and the South. Investors have most likely shifted their attention elsewhere because of increasing home prices in California metro areas. In general, investment has grown in metro areas like Boise, Phoenix and Salt Lake City, which tend to have lower prices and growing populations fueled by California out-migration. In this way, investors are unlike today's homebuyers. For instance, desiring affordability and warm weather, homebuyers flocked to Florida in 2020, with the state accounting for nearly half of the top 15 metros with the highest in-migration. 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 096- CoreLogic 2020 U.S Investor Homebuying Rates: Top Ten MSAs 2011 vs 2020 2011 25% 2096 15% 10% 5% 0%- Springfield, MO Phoenix-Mesa-Scottsdale, AZ Provo-Orem, UT Wichita, KS Salt Lake City, UT Memphis, TN-MS-AR Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Roswell, GA Kansas City, MO-KS Boise City, ID Corpus Christi, TX Corpus Christi, TX Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, TX San Diego-Carlsbad, CA Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA Stockton-Lodi, CA San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, CA 80#92020 U.S Investor Homebuying Rates: Bottom Ten MSAs 2011 vs 2020 The change in the bottom 10 metros was less striking than the top 10. Investor rates were lowest in the Northeast in 2011 and remained so in 2020. Buffalo, Pittsburgh, Boston, Rochester, New York; Hartford, Connecticut and Providence, Rhode Island made up six of the bottom 10 metro areas in both years. CoreLogic 2011 10% 969 968 4% 2% 960 . Providence-Warwick, RI-MA Madison, WI Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT Rochester, NY Pittsburgh, PA Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT Worcester, MA-CT Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-PA Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI Pittsburgh, PA Toledo, OH Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH Rochester, NY Buffalo-Cheektowaga-Niagara Falls, NY Providence-Warwick, RI-MA Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT 9#10Increase in Investor Activity Associated with Greater Housing Stock Turnover Additionally, investors have gained market share over the last decade as housing market turnover has increased. At the metropolitan level, there appears to be a good correlation between the two, as shown by the fitted line in the figure below. It seems that increasing investor activity goes hand-in-hand with market turnover, or the percentage of homes that are sold.² 2 Turnover is calculated as the share of homes sold in a MSA in a year. For instance, if an MSA has a stock of 100,000 units and 10,000 of them sell in a given year, the velocity for that year is 0.1. CoreLogic Change in Market Tumover, 2011-20 6% 4% 2% 09 -20 -4% -6% -8% -10% -2% -1% 0% 196 2% 396 4% Change in Investor Share, 2011-20 •#11This could indicate that investors are "crowding out” homebuyers by purchasing homes that would have otherwise gone to prospective homeowners, but we can't say this with any certainty. It is just as possible that investors are seeing a hot market and choosing to jump in because they anticipate further gains. In 2020, a new factor influencing investment behavior arose: eviction moratoriums. In places with moratoriums and strong tenant rights, renters who couldn't pay made it challenging to have a reliably lucrative investment. These restrictions likely deterred investor activity since they brought an additional layer of risk to the market. CoreLogic 11#12The Path Forward While we found that the national investor share has fallen from 2018, we can't definitively link this to any single market condition. The share decline can't be attributed solely to the coronavirus pandemic, as rates were also down in 2019. In 2020 cities with the most investor activity - like Boise, Phoenix and Kansas City, Missouri were high-growth markets with relatively low prices that have moved investors' attention away from California. Although investors seem to have lost some of their market share to owner-occupant buyers, it's hard to say how long this trend will continue, or what long-term implications it will have on the larger market. At this juncture, the first year into the new decade and the first-year since the start of the pandemic, what we may see as the housing market cools down - with more for-sale inventory and slower home-price growth in 2022 - is an increase in the investor share.³ 3 According to the June 2021 CoreLogic HPITM Forecast, prices are expected to increase 3.2% nationally from June 2021 to June 2022, a huge slow down from 17.2% from June 2020 to June 2021. This report defines an investor as an entity (individual or corporate) who retained three or more properties simultaneously within the past 10 years. This report uses CoreLogic Public Records data and enhances the definition of an investor purchase that was introduced in a 2019 CoreLogic report. The previous report identified an investor purchase by looking for a corporate or non-individual identifier on the deed. Examples include LLCS, CORPS, and INCs, to name a few. This report includes those purchases but in addition, can identify more investor purchases by seeing how many properties a person with the same name and address retains at any one time. CoreLogic CoreLogic 2011-2020 Investor Homebuying Report All Rights Reserved. CoreLogic Inc. 2021 12

Download to PowerPoint

Download presentation as an editable powerpoint.

Related

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Results Presentation Deck image

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Results Presentation Deck

Real Estate

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Investor Presentation Deck image

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Investor Presentation Deck

Real Estate

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Investor Presentation Deck image

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Investor Presentation Deck

Real Estate

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Investor Presentation Deck image

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Investor Presentation Deck

Real Estate

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Results Presentation Deck image

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Results Presentation Deck

Real Estate

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Results Presentation Deck image

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Results Presentation Deck

Real Estate

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Results Presentation Deck image

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Results Presentation Deck

Real Estate

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Results Presentation Deck image

KKR Real Estate Finance Trust Results Presentation Deck

Real Estate